Money, Economy, and Government
Strategies and ideas based on today's economic situation.

Is it just me or do you get the feeling that the feds rewrite their money policy almost on a daily basis? It seems reactionary at times, but it’s the reaction caused by a previous policy blunder that creates a different reaction and a different blunder to follow….it’s a vicious circle!

So what do the feds actually want? It appears now that they want INFLATION! What? I thought inflation was bad. Well it is if it takes off at ground level, but the economist say we are now experiencing deflation, so the feds need inflation to compensate.

Maybe a short economics discussion is in order. Let’s look at the variables in very basic terms.

M=money supply – how much money is available

V=Velocity of money – how fast money moves through the system

P=Price of money – either inflation or deflation

Q=Quantity of Production – GDP

If you reduce V velocity (which is happening today) and if you don’t increase the M supply of money, you are going to have deflation. We are watching the velocity of money slow. People are getting nervous, they are not borrowing and spending as much, either because they can’t or for obvious reasons are using discretionary income to pay off debt or increase their savings. You would think this is a good thing for the family, reduce debt and save more, but not if you’re the government. This entire economy has been based on credit, borrowing, and spending…..velocity….which increases GDP, but this growth has been fictitious because we weren’t spending our money, we were spending our future earnings through debt. You knew it was just a matter of time before we would “max-out” our borrowing power.

The probability of deflation is ever increasing. When we increase M the supply of money and V, velocity stays the same, and if GDP does not grow, that means we’ll have inflation. More money chasing fewer goods…..it’s the old supply and demand equation.

As I said earlier we currently have slower velocity of money and thus slower growth of GDP. Keep this in mind: earnings equal growth. Without spending companies have little to no earnings which results in slower or stagnant growth or what we are experiencing now…..deflation. This scares the FED, so what is there answer? They have to keep printing money M until V velocity kicks in and we begin to see inflation. The feds are calling it “quantitative easing.” They announced $300 billion of easing last week. This will happen every quarter, $300 billion, $500 billion etc….until their achieve their desired result…..inflation. This could become a really big number and a side effect may be another asset bubble in the stock market. One economist said it may take $2 trillion of “easing” to achieve the desired result. However, will this cause the pendulum to swing in the opposite direction and double digit inflation will rear its ugly head? There has to be such a supply of cheap money to encourage lenders to lend and borrowers to borrow to induce a spending to produce inflation. This could take years to accomplish……and I don’t think we’ve hit bottom yet. Bill Fleckenstein is a very famous short trader. He closed a short fund a couple of months ago. He says he doesn’t have as many good opportunities, and basically he’s scared of being short with so much stimulus going on.

Another unintended consequence of printing so much money will be a weaker dollar…..this is an entirely different discussion but can we afford to have a weaker dollar globally? Who will buy our debt?

The real answer is staring us in the face, but we seem to overlook it. We have to get the FED’s out of the equation. Let the markets dictate interest rates, velocity, price, and growth. We can’t keep manipulating the country’s economy. It doesn’t work, hasn’t worked and will not work long term. This stimulus “fix” will probably end up being more of a disaster and make for a harder landing then would have otherwise been by letting the markets run their course. We will experience deflation followed by inflation followed by more manipulation so put on your neck brace because this economy is going to make your head spin!


Tags: , , , ,

(recently written by my Father, Dan)

Currently the feds have elected to flood the market with additional funds for mortgages and in particular for refinancing current mortgages. Rates are as low as 4.5%.

But how long can this last?

Let’s look at the junk bond market as a potential indicator of what could happen.

First off what makes a bond a “junk” bond? Think of it as a risk reward proposition. If I were to offer you a very safe, stable, predictable bond with little to no risk, I would be able to offer this bond at a very low rate because the probability of this bond being paid out at maturity is very high. On the other hand if I offer you a more risky bond that has the probability of defaulting, in order to attract you to purchase such a bond I will have to offer you a higher rate for you to accept the risk. Simply put the higher the risk the higher the reward should be.

As our government continues to print money without any real backing and as we auction off more and more debt through the treasury department. The time may soon come when those who are investing in our government bonds will demand a higher rate for those bonds as the probability of default looms ever higher. In other words we are printing money and debt that we simply cannot pay back with our current budget and taxes. Something will have to give at some point.

China is one of the largest purchasers of our debt. As they see our inability to repay these debts increase they will likely demand a more attractive interest rate to continue purchasing our debt. The US Treasury Bonds could soon become a “junk bond” in the investment world. The result could be dramatic. In all probability we would have to increase interest rates to attract new buyers or to keep current buyers investing at maturity.

If this scenario plays out you can be assured that all interest rates will rise. How high? Who knows. But remember we did this once before in the late 70’s and early 80’s. You may want to assess your portfolio and determine how much interest rate risk you are actually taking, maybe even unknowingly.

Remember the general rule; bond values decrease as interest rates increase and vice versa. The longer the duration of the bond the more widely the fluctuation can be. Although the interest rate remains the same, the underlying “market value” of the bond can fluctuate until the bond matures at face value.

For example. Let’s assume I purchase a 20 year bond for $1,000 (par value) today and the interest rate is 4%. Now let’s fast forward 2-3 years and interest rates have climbed to 7%. Now a bond buyer could purchase a $1,000 bond (par value) and get 7%.  For my valuation purposes a calculation is made which discounts my $1,000 bond in order to equal the current 7% rates. I won’t go into that yield calculation here, but suffice it to say in order for me to attract someone to buy my 4% bond, when they can buy a 7% bond today, I will have to discount my $1,000 par value in order for them to essentially achieve the same return as they would by buying the 7% bond today.

If interest rates are being held artificially low, and if the chance of interest rate hikes are on the horizon, what are your options?

 

Dan Thompson – Registered Representative

2502 N. Constance Pl.

Eagle, ID 83616

Phone (208) 939-5910

Securities and investment advice offered through Capital Financial Services, Inc. Broker/Dealer Investment Advisor Member FINRA/SIPC

 

Posted via email from My Posterous


Tags: , ,

Powered by Wordpress
Theme © 2005 - 2009 FrederikM.de
BlueMod is a modification of the blueblog_DE Theme by Oliver Wunder